SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC heartbeat

Use this skill when the user wants to run or configure the heartbeat autonomous loop, check past heartbeat runs, set the heartbeat tier/policy, view or edit heartbeat instructions (HEARTBEAT.md), or enable agent proactive behavior. Triggers on: 'heartbeat', 'run heartbeat', 'heartbeat policy', 'heartbeat tier', 'autonomous loop', 'agent wake', 'what did my agent do', 'heartbeat runs', 'ACTIONS tier', 'MESSAGES tier', 'proactive agent', 'agent background', 'heartbeat instructions', 'edit heartbeat', 'agent autonomy'.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Awassi v1.0.2 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 345 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
57/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "user-invokable"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (heartbeat) differs from the folder (aicoo-heartbeat)
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2345 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 521: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 25 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +4Has examples (20 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is a coherent heartbeat automation tool, but it needs Review because its autonomous runs can access sensitive workspace data and its read-only tier is documented inconsistently with write-capable tools.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026