SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB free-image-and-video-generation

Free local AI image and video processing toolkit with cloud AI generation. Local tools: upscale (Real-ESRGAN), face enhance (GFPGAN/CodeFormer), background remove (rembg), object erase (LaMa), face swap (InsightFace), segment (FastSAM), media process (FFmpeg). Cloud tools: AI image/video generation via Atlas Cloud API (300+ models). For cloud generation, ALWAYS first use Atlas Cloud MCP tools (atlas_list_models, atlas_get_model_info) to find the model ID and parameter schema, then call scripts/ai-generate.py with the correct --model and parameters. Use when user asks to process, enhance, upscale, generate, or edit images/videos.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: MikeWang v1.0.3 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 2 445 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 65/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice, progress reporting

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
65/100
Nearly there
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 65/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 10 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2445 tokens

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 636: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 16 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +3All 8 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    The skill appears to do the advertised image and video processing work, with clear privacy and disk-space caveats for cloud generation and model downloads.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026