SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB edrawmax-diagram

Generate diagrams from natural language using EdrawMax AI APIs. Supports four diagram types: flowchart (流程图), infographic (信息图), Gantt chart (甘特图), and mind map (思维导图). Use when the user wants to create, generate, or draw any of these diagram types. Triggers on: 'generate a flowchart,' 'create a mind map,' 'draw a Gantt chart,' 'make an infographic,' 'visualize a process,' 'project timeline,' 'knowledge map,' or any request to turn a description into a diagram.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: EdrawMax-AI v1.0.2 MIT-0 5 files body ≈ 1 105 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 66/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, progress reporting

GeneratorInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
98/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
95
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
66/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: edrawmax-diagram (ClawHub)

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 66/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (edrawmax-diagram) differs from the folder (build-diagram)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 14 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1105 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 465: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 14 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 95.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This diagram skill does what it claims, but its required downloader saves remote files with TLS verification disabled and without limiting downloads to trusted diagram hosts.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026