BD medical-cell-biology-7th-edition
Systematically integrated core skills of Medical Cell Biology — based on the 7th edition of the national planning textbook (PMPH). Covers 146 core competencies across all major cell biology domains.
Systematically integrated core skills of Medical Cell Biology — based on the 7th edition of the national planning textbook (PMPH).
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenindex.md:1High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)# 医学细胞生物学核心技能集（基于教材《4B32…fcb》）
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (medical-cell-biology-7th-edition) differs from the folder (medical-cell-biology-pmph-7edition)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2394 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 198: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.