SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC gitlab-agent

Operate assigned GitLab work with owner-verified project access and guarded MR delivery.

ClawHub Agent Skills v1.85.1 7 files · 5 scripts body ≈ 5 573 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 59/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

IntegrationGitLabInfrastructureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
80/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
51
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
59/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Result and completion w 14
40
Consistency w 8
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: gitlab-agent (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 5573 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 59/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (gitlab-agent) differs from the folder (xrowgmbh-gitlab-agent)
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5573 tokens
  • 85Steps. 95 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 16 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 88: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • -32 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 36 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 95 items
  • +4Has examples (30 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 51.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This GitLab automation skill is not clearly malicious, but it gives an agent broad recurring authority to change GitLab projects without fresh user approval.
LLM: suspicious (high)