AC google-gemini-media
Use the Gemini API (Nano Banana image generation, Veo video, Gemini TTS speech and audio understanding) to deliver end-to-end multimodal media workflows and code templates for "generation + understanding".
As a process C 57/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice
IntegrationSoftware developmentInfrastructureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
low Exfiltration
net-credential-useSKILL.md:131Credential used in a network call (verify the destination is the intended service) (destination is a well-known publishing service)curl -s -X POST "https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemi…ent" -H "x-goog-api-key: $GEMINI_API_KEY" -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d '{known service
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 57/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4462 tokens
- 85Steps. 91 steps, 2 vague phrases
- 100Failures and branches. 5 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 205: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 49 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 91 items
- +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 85.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This skill is a Gemini media API template guide that openly sends user-selected prompts and media to Google APIs and shows no hidden execution or persistence.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026