SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF deep-research

深度研究技能，用于进行领域调研、文献调研、survey研究。当用户说"做一个survey"、"深度研究一下XX"、"文献调研"、"研究一下XX领域的最新进展"、"帮我调研XX"、"学术调研"时自动触发。支持arXiv、PubMed、PMC、Google Scholar等多个数据源，自动下载PDF并解析全文，生成三层报告（执行摘要、验证清单、完整报告）。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xueylee-dotcom v7.0.0 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 895 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/research_claw_bridge.py

ProcedureData and analyticsWriting and documentsResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/research_claw_bridge.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/research_claw_bridge.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/research_claw_bridge.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/research_claw_bridge.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (deep-research) differs from the folder (deep-research-v7)
  • 100Steps. 36 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 895 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 177: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This research skill is broadly legitimate, but it exposes a hardcoded third-party API key and has under-scoped web fetching, authenticated-site, and file-writing behavior that should be reviewed before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026