SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC openclaw-security-suite

Comprehensive security suite for OpenClaw skills. Includes static scanning (AST + keywords) and AI-powered semantic behavior review to detect malicious code.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: xunxingyuan v0.2.3 MIT-0 16 files body ≈ 368 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerInfrastructureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
98
Quality 40%
73
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege config/malicious_patterns.json:30
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (string literal in code, not executed)
    "chmod 777"
    code literal

A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "requirements"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "input_schema"

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 9 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 368 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 157: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 73.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a coherent security-scanning skill, with user-directed file reading and LLM review that are expected for its purpose but should be used carefully on sensitive files.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026