SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD critical-debater-suite

Multi-agent adversarial debate system with 4 roles (Pro, Con, Judge, Orchestrator), per-round evidence refresh, 5-element reasoning chains, and structured bilingual Markdown report output. Use this skill when the user says "debate", "start a debate", "red team this", "analyze from multiple perspectives", or provides a topic for critical examination.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SeanX v2.0.0 MIT-0 19 files · 4 scripts body ≈ 493 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

AnalyzerInfrastructureData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 6

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 6
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security examples/quickstart.md:65
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)
      ## Red Team Mode
      fixture
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security examples/quickstart.md:68
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)
      red team this: "Our company should migrate all services to Kubernetes"
      fixture
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security examples/quickstart.md:71
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (detector / deny-list definition; test fixture / example file)
      In red team mode:
      detectorfixture
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security examples/quickstart.md:72
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (test fixture / example file)
      - Con = Red Team (identifies risks)
      fixture
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:7
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (quoted — discussed, not commanded)
      "red team this", "analyze from multiple perspectives", or provides a topic for
      quoted
    • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SKILL.md:26
      Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use) (documentation table row)
      | "debate", "start a debate", "red team this", "analyze from multiple perspectives", full topic for debate | `capabilities/debate.md` |
      table

    Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (critical-debater-suite) differs from the folder (critical-debater)
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 75Steps. 3 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 493 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • -35 of 5 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 351: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 6 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 3 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is mostly a coherent debate/research workflow, but it includes an under-specified optional cron job that would persistently rerun networked evidence refreshes and mutate reports after the session ends.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026