BF results-statistics-convention-checker
用于诊断英文心理学论文 Results（结果）部分的统计报告规范，检查 M、SD、t(df)、F(df1, df2)、p 值、效应量（Cohen's d、partial η²、r 等）、置信区间的报告格式与完整性，以及统计结果与文字描述的一致性，判断是否符合 APA 风格统计报告习惯。当用户提供 Results 草稿并希望检查统计报告格式、补充效应量或置信区间、核对统计量与文字描述是否一致、或需要按 APA 格式改写统计结果陈述时触发本 Skill。仅针对 Results 部分的统计报告写作规范，不替代统计计算本身。
用于诊断英文心理学论文 Results（结果）部分的统计报告规范，检查 M、SD、t(df)、F(df1, df2)、p 值、效应量（Cohen's d、partial η²、r 等）、置信区间的报告格式与完整性，以及统计结果与文字描述的一致性，判断是否符合 APA 风格统计报告习惯。当用户提供 Results…
As a process F 44/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/examples/examples_memberB.md, references/checklist.md, references/rubric.md
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/examples/examples_memberB.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/checklist.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/rubric.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/examples/examples_memberB.md, references/checklist.md, references/rubric.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 100Steps. 49 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 701 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 261: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.