AC webdav-sync
Archive local files or directories into tar/tar.gz and upload them to a WebDAV endpoint, with optional notifications. Use when the user asks to back up a folder, sync files to WebDAV on a schedule, or update archive exclusions and remote paths. Trigger when user asks->'Sync this folder to WebDAV every night', 'Back up this directory to WebDAV and notify me'. Capabilities->(1) Create deterministic archives with exclude rules, (2) create remote WebDAV directories and upload via PUT, (3) integrate with wrappers and scheduled jobs, (4) evolve sync rules safely over time.
Archive local files or directories into tar/tar.gz and upload them to a WebDAV endpoint, with optional notifications. Use when the user asks to back up a…
As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "learnable"
Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 15 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 541 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 573: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.