SKILLEMALL.ai

AC twitter-hot-topics

每小时自动搜索推特上关于中国、加密货币、国际热点、美国热点、特朗普等话题的热度信息,提取排行前十的热点,并基于 X 平台真实算法权重(开源代码数据)为每个热点生成高曝光推文或线程。当用户提到"推特热点"、"Twitter热点"、"推特搜索"、"热点推文"、"生成推文"、"社交媒体监控"、"Twitter监控"、"推文生成"、"热门话题"、"推特监控"等关键词时,必须使用此技能。即使用户只说"帮我写推文"或"查推特热点"也要触发此技能。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yanghui-88 v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 905 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 52 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 905 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -228 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 219: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 52 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is not malware, but it asks for recurring Twitter/X trend monitoring with broad automatic triggers and unclear user control.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026