AD personality-analyzer
从聊天记录中深度分析人物性格、说话风格和心理画像，输出结构化分析报告。当用户要求分析某人的聊天记录、说话风格、性格特征、心理画像时使用此 skill。典型触发："分析一下这个人"、"分析聊天记录"、"提取说话风格"、"人物画像分析"、"帮我分析一下TA"、"分析形象"。
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (personality-analyzer) differs from the folder (personality-analysis)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 42 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 513 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 135: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 15 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This skill analyzes private chats as advertised, but it also pushes sensitive profiling into manipulation, forced negative labels, and style imitation without adequate user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026