SKILLEMALL.ai

BF intelligence-brain

AI原生公司情报大脑引擎:八步代谢管线(采集→解析→拆解→整理→合并→使用→删除→举一反三)+跨文件推论(三条日报拼出一个真相)+三通道神经链冗余+四级信息密级自动路由。信息吃进去,决策吐出来——大脑不是数据库,是消化系统。触发词:「公司大脑」「情报引擎」「信息代谢」「知识图谱」「决策支持」「AI大脑」「情报处理」「信号处理」

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Ygq19901001 v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 894 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

AI原生公司情报大脑引擎:八步代谢管线(采集→解析→拆解→整理→合并→使用→删除→举一反三)+跨文件推论(三条日报拼出一个真相)+三通道神经链冗余+四级信息密级自动路由。信息吃进去,决策吐出来——大脑不是数据库,是消化系统。触发词:「公司大脑」「情报引擎」「信息代谢」「知识图谱」「决策支持」「AI大脑」「情报处理」「…

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/pipeline-playbook.md, references/inference-patterns.md, references/neural-chain-design.md

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
58
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/pipeline-playbook.md, references/inference-patterns.md, references/neural-chain-design.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/pipeline-playbook.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/inference-patterns.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/neural-chain-design.md
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "summary"

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/pipeline-playbook.md, references/inference-patterns.md, references/neural-chain-design.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/pipeline-playbook.md, references/inference-patterns.md, references/neural-chain-design.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 36 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 894 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 164: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 58.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent company-intelligence workflow, but it asks agents to automatically ingest, route, mirror, monitor, and delete business data without enough user-control safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 1 Jul 2026