SKILLEMALL.ai

AC stratagem

Thirty-Six Stratagems (三十六计) strategic analysis — game theory, systems thinking, cognitive psychology, and Sun Tzu principles applied to competitive scenarios. Use when the user asks about any of the 36 stratagems by name (CN or EN), invokes /stratagem or /36计, discusses 战略/策略/博弈/商战/competitive strategy/business warfare, or presents a competitive scenario asking "怎么办" / "how should I deal with". Auto-adjusts from quick stratagem lookup to full 7-dimension analysis.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yhc2026 v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 327 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Thirty-Six Stratagems (三十六计) strategic analysis — game theory, systems thinking, cognitive psychology, and Sun Tzu principles applied to competitive scenarios.

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerWriting and documentsOperations and projectstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
89
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (stratagem) differs from the folder (sanshiliuji)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 25 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1327 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 469: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 23 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
    • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 89.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a disclosed strategy-analysis skill, but it needs review because it can apply deceptive or manipulative tactics to broad everyday strategy requests without clear ethical limits.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 12 Jul 2026