SKILLEMALL.ai

AA conversation-distill

At the natural end of a meaningful conversation, show a one-line soft reminder asking the user if they want to distill — do NOT auto-start. Only ask when the conversation had distillation value (decisions, insights, judgments, lessons, open questions, action items). If user says yes, run the full 5-step classify→confirm→write flow. Trigger reminder when: (1) closing phrases detected ('thanks', 'done', 'that's all', '好的就这样') AND conversation had substantive content; (2) user explicitly says 'distill', 'wrap up', '收尾'. Never auto-start without asking first.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YING99 v1.1.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 2 820 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process A 85/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: running it twice

AnalyzerInfrastructureLearningtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
85/100
Runs to the end
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
60
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "permissions"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 85/100

    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 45 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 4 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2820 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
    • -224 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 561: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 45 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a documentation-only note-distillation skill that may inspect the current conversation and optionally write approved summaries to a notes tool, with no executable code or requested permissions.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 10 Jun 2026