SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AB acp-router

Route plain-language requests for Pi, Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, or ACP harness work into either OpenClaw ACP runtime sessions or direct acpx-driven sessions ("telephone game" flow). For coding-agent thread requests, read this skill first, then use only `sessions_spawn` for thread creation.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yimeihuang1999-leaves v1.0.0 2 files body ≈ 1 857 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process B 77/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

IntegrationSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
87
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
77/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
30
Running it twice w 4
30
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 77/100

    • 30Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 78 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Failures and branches. 6 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1857 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 306: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 15 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 78 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This routing skill is mostly coherent, but it can automatically install tooling, restart services, and alter user ACPX configuration without clear user approval.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026