AA openclaw-rd-pipeline
Orchestrate OpenClaw end-to-end R&D delivery in Feishu from requirement intake to closure using PM, developer, reviewer, and tester subagents. Use when handling研发任务 that need structured requirement parsing, project-context enrichment from Feishu history/wiki, coding + PR flow, read-only review/testing gates, bug-loop rework, and final owner notification.
As a process A 85/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: when it triggers, running it twice
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 85/100
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 10 mutating operations with no state check
- 70Failures and branches. 9 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 71 steps
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1424 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 356: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 14 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 71 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 94.