SKILLEMALL.ai

BC sasac-performance-analyst

国资委企业绩效评价智能分析SKILL | SASAC Enterprise Performance Evaluation Skill 基于2025年版《企业绩效评价标准值》,提供精准对标、绩效诊断、改进建议与报告生成。 覆盖10大行业门类、48个行业中类、107个行业小类、332个标准值表(含国际对标)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: WANG DONG JIE v2.0.0 MIT-0 15 files body ≈ 2 808 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "email"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "language"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "repository"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "clawhub"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "keywords"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "date"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 57 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2808 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -222 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 153: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 48 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 57 items
  • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a coherent financial benchmarking and report-generation skill, but users should treat inputs and generated reports as sensitive business data.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jun 2026