AD skill-reviewer
Comprehensive skill review and validation. Use when you need to audit an OpenClaw skill for correctness, completeness, and compliance with OpenClaw specifications. Performs three levels of review: (1) Format validation via package_skill.py, (2) Content quality assessment of SKILL.md structure and writing, (3) Functional verification that generated templates/scripts match actual OpenClaw specifications.
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
frontmatter-yamlSKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Comprehensive skill review and validation. Use when you need to au… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (skill-reviewer) differs from the folder (openclaw-skill-reviewer)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 60 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1117 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 405: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 60 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.