SKILLEMALL.ai

AC moltbook-engagement

Battle-tested toolkit for Moltbook platform engagement. Use when: (1) Posting or commenting on Moltbook with built-in deduplication protection, (2) Scanning feeds for engagement opportunities and trending content, (3) Monitoring your posts for comments requiring replies, (4) Tracking post performance metrics and content playbook updates, (5) Engaging with the agent community while avoiding duplicate content.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yoder-bawt v1.0.0 9 files body ≈ 2 371 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 64/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, progress reporting

ProcedureInfrastructureAI and agentsData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
91
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
64/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 64/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 54 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2371 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 411: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 54 items
    • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 4 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill does what it claims for Moltbook engagement, but it has review-worthy hidden/under-scoped access around a hard-coded Redis host, credential discovery, and account-specific posting guidance.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 27 May 2026