SKILLEMALL.ai

AD yotta-prompt

元引 —— 意图澄清 + 生态入口技能:用户输入一句模糊的话 / 一个词时,识别意图、给出 2-4 个候选方向、深挖(目标/范围/输出/约束),再串联到对应元阁技能输出可直接运行的提示词。常驻注入(always-load):每次新会话开始自动生效,接住「不会用 AI、不知道怎么提问」的用户。触发:用户不知道怎么提问、不知道想要什么、输入模糊的一句话 / 一个词、想被引导到合适技能时。边界:只澄清意图、不预设立场、不做安全评审;提示词不人为设限(不违规/不犯法/不越狱即可);不做 prompt 美化;纯本地离线。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YottaMeta v0.1.2 MIT-0 12 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 032 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

元引 —— 意图澄清 + 生态入口技能:用户输入一句模糊的话 / 一个词时,识别意图、给出 2-4 个候选方向、深挖(目标/范围/输出/约束),再串联到对应元阁技能输出可直接运行的提示词。常驻注入(always-load):每次新会话开始自动生效,接住「不会用…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 27 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1032 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 258: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 11 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 27 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is mostly a local prompt-clarification helper, but it tells agents to persistently auto-enable it in future sessions without asking the user.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 3 Sept 2026