SKILLEMALL.ai

BC yotta-workflow

跨会话/跨项目通用工作流标准:让任何 AI 智能体活过会话——开工必读状态、状态只存项目根目录的 .workflow、进行中自动记流水/任务/决策、收工必留交接锚点。项目根目录是状态锚点,源码目录可嵌套且 .git 不等于项目根目录。触发:开工/接手项目、续测、收工、跨会话恢复、要落盘、多步开发、项目状态变化、跨智能体协作。边界:只记录项目状态(进度/任务/决策/流水),不写 AI 人格、用户偏好、关系或跨项目通用知识;轻量一次性问答不强制初始化。所有 AI 智能体通用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: YottaMeta v0.4.1 MIT-0 16 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 572 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 10 h ago

跨会话/跨项目通用工作流标准:让任何 AI 智能体活过会话——开工必读状态、状态只存项目根目录的 .workflow、进行中自动记流水/任务/决策、收工必留交接锚点。项目根目录是状态锚点,源码目录可嵌套且 .git…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
71
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "agent_created"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 49 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1572 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 238: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 16 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 49 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 71.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The workflow skill is mostly coherent, but users should review it because it automatically persists project state and its recommended installers have supply-chain and filesystem-safety risks.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 13 Sept 2026