AC spreadsheet-analysis
使用场景: 用户需要分析 XLSX 或 CSV、概括表格、依据单元格内容问答、对比多份表格，或导出带工作表与行号证据的结果时；不用于旧版 XLS、加密文件或宏执行。
使用场景: 用户需要分析 XLSX 或 CSV、概括表格、依据单元格内容问答、对比多份表格，或导出带工作表与行号证据的结果时；不用于旧版 XLS、加密文件或宏执行。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
AnalyzerExcelData and analyticsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 13 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 324 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 82: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 6 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill appears to provide the advertised spreadsheet analysis, but review is warranted because a configurable server setting can redirect spreadsheet text and the API key, and crafted XLSX files could exhaust local resources.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 7 Sept 2026