SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF xiaohongshu-similar-account

小红书创作者对标账号匹配工具，输入小红书账号ID或赛道+粉丝数+账号等级，推荐可直接复制的同阶对标和可参考的高阶标杆；当用户需要小红书账号推荐、KOL对标、起号参考、账号投放选择时使用。⚠️ 严禁任何联网搜索。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: to the moon v1.0.5 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 306 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

小红书创作者对标账号匹配工具，输入小红书账号ID或赛道+粉丝数+账号等级，推荐可直接复制的同阶对标和可参考的高阶标杆；当用户需要小红书账号推荐、KOL对标、起号参考、账号投放选择时使用。⚠️ 严禁任何联网搜索。

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: 账号链接, scripts/xiaohongshu_account_recommender.py

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
83/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
57
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: 账号链接, scripts/xiaohongshu_account_recommender.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: 账号链接
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/xiaohongshu_account_recommender.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: 账号链接, scripts/xiaohongshu_account_recommender.py
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: 账号链接, scripts/xiaohongshu_account_recommender.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 31 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1306 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 105: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 22 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 31 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 57.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill does what it claims, but it sends queries and an API key to RedFox with TLS certificate verification disabled, which makes credential interception and response tampering materially possible.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 5 Aug 2026