SKILLEMALL.ai

AC discover-patent-white-space-opportunities

从专利地图中发现候选空白点,评估其问题价值,诊断空白背后的关键矛盾,并提出矛盾化解思路。适用于分析专利地图、技术-功效矩阵、技术-应用矩阵、专利聚类图、技术路线图或专利稀疏区域。候选空白点选择后及问题价值评估后,必须分别取得用户确认;不开展后续技术验证、商业验证或专利布局论证。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yuanzhian-patsnap v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 097 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

从专利地图中发现候选空白点,评估其问题价值,诊断空白背后的关键矛盾,并提出矛盾化解思路。适用于分析专利地图、技术-功效矩阵、技术-应用矩阵、专利聚类图、技术路线图或专利稀疏区域。候选空白点选择后及问题价值评估后,必须分别取得用户确认;不开展后续技术验证、商业验证或专利布局论证。

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "copyright"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 89 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1097 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 139: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 18 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 89 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a coherent patent-analysis workflow that clearly guides staged user confirmations and only creates a session report as part of its stated reporting function.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Aug 2026