SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC generic-drug-scout

运行仿药速探 V1，创建用于仿制药机会发现的静态交互式 HTML 报告或预置结果筛查页面。适用于用户要求筛选中国小分子晶型专利到期机会、生成带结果的仿药速探 V1，或创建由已配置智慧芽/PatSnap MCP 支撑的本地报告的场景。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yuanzhian-patsnap v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 012 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

运行仿药速探 V1，创建用于仿制药机会发现的静态交互式 HTML 报告或预置结果筛查页面。适用于用户要求筛选中国小分子晶型专利到期机会、生成带结果的仿药速探 V1，或创建由已配置智慧芽/PatSnap MCP 支撑的本地报告的场景。

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "copyright"

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 46 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1012 tokens
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 116: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -31 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 12 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 46 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill mostly matches its report-generation purpose, but it directly reads the user's Codex MCP configuration to call PatSnap services, which deserves review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · 13 Aug 2026