SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC mab-fto-check

单克隆抗体（mAb）药物专利自由实施（FTO）分析。基于智慧芽专利数据库（PatSnap）+ 序列比对（ls_sequence_alignment）+ 化学结构检索（ls_structure_search），执行9模块并行检索+M1.5修饰检索（含中文专项检索），遵循全面覆盖原则+等同原则，输出HTML格式FTO报告（七章标准结构）。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yuanzhian-patsnap v1.0.0 MIT-0 11 files body ≈ 1 876 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

单克隆抗体（mAb）药物专利自由实施（FTO）分析。基于智慧芽专利数据库（PatSnap）+ 序列比对（lssequencealignment）+…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
76
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "copyright"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 89 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1876 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -212 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 168: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 89 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (7 of 8)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed patent-FTO workflow that relies on user-authorized PatSnap/MCP tools and local report files, with no hidden persistence or exfiltration found.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Aug 2026