AC patent-avoidance-design
基于TRIZ方法论的完整专利规避设计流程。 当用户要求分析专利进行规避设计、生成不侵权替代方案、或进行专利规避分析时使用。 触发词包括："专利规避"、"规避设计"、"专利规避设计"、"不侵权方案"、"patent avoidance"、"生成不侵权方案"。 本技能嵌套调用 patent-claim-to-funcmodel 子技能完成功能模型还原（8步）， 然后执行：(1) TRIZ裁剪（规则A/B/C），(2) 功能导向检索FOS， (3) 非等效方案生成，(4) 侵权判定（全面覆盖原则 + 等同原则 + 禁止反悔原则）。
基于TRIZ方法论的完整专利规避设计流程。 当用户要求分析专利进行规避设计、生成不侵权替代方案、或进行专利规避分析时使用。 触发词包括："专利规避"、"规避设计"、"专利规避设计"、"不侵权方案"、"patent avoidance"、"生成不侵权方案"。 本技能嵌套调用…
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "copyright"
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 157 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3693 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 265: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 38 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 157 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.