SKILLEMALL.ai

AC patent-panorama-analysis

专利技术全景分析报告自动生成。用户上传专利数据Excel表格(含标题、申请人、申请日、法律状态、受理局、被引次数等字段)和技术拆解Excel表格后,自动分析专利数据并生成可编辑的HTML全景分析报告。 报告包含5大模块:技术概况分析、重点技术分支分析、竞争对手分析、专利风险分析、企业专利布局建议。 触发条件:当用户提及"专利分析""技术全景分析""专利全景报告""专利布局分析""CMC专利分析""专利竞争分析""专利风险""FTO分析""技术分解""专利趋势"等关键词时自动触发。也适用于用户上传专利数据Excel并要求生成分析报告的场景。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yuanzhian-patsnap v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 937 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

专利技术全景分析报告自动生成。用户上传专利数据Excel表格(含标题、申请人、申请日、法律状态、受理局、被引次数等字段)和技术拆解Excel表格后,自动分析专利数据并生成可编辑的HTML全景分析报告。 报告包含5大模块:技术概况分析、重点技术分支分析、竞争对手分析、专利风险分析、企业专利布局建议。…

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "copyright"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 937 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 272: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (3 of 3)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill reads user-provided patent spreadsheets, analyzes them locally with a bundled Python script, and generates an editable HTML report, with no evidence of hidden persistence, exfiltration, or destructive behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Aug 2026