SKILLEMALL.ai

AC patent-panorama-insights

当用户需要基于 PatSnap 或智慧芽专利 MCP/API 数据开展专利全景、专利版图、竞争专利情报、技术路线图、组合规划、产品/R&D 策略项目时使用本技能——无论用户显式调用 /patent-panorama-insights(或 @patent-panorama-insights),还是用自然语言描述这类专利分析任务。本技能编排五层流水线:环节1检索与降噪(patent-panorama-insights-search)、环节2全景统计与价值挖掘(patent-panorama-insights-stats)、环节3标引体系推荐(patent-panorama-insights-tag)、客户 SaaS 工具中的人工标引交接,以及环节4有证据支撑的单文件 HTML 报告(patent-panorama-insights-report),并管理各层之间的检查点、人工标引交接、回滚和进度汇报。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yuanzhian-patsnap v1.0.0 MIT-0 12 files body ≈ 3 585 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

当用户需要基于 PatSnap 或智慧芽专利 MCP/API 数据开展专利全景、专利版图、竞争专利情报、技术路线图、组合规划、产品/R&D 策略项目时使用本技能——无论用户显式调用 /patent-panorama-insights(或…

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
75
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 12. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "copyright"

Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 124 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3585 tokens
  • low 16 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 404: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 124 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed patent-analysis workflow that uses PatSnap MCP tools and local report files in ways that fit its stated purpose.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 13 Aug 2026