SKILLEMALL.ai

DF phd-research-companion

(no description)

Not recommendedlow grade D
ClawHub Agent Skills author: yue123161 v1.0.2 MIT-0 13 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 577 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 30/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/create_experiment_design.py

ProcedureLaTeXData and analyticsResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
D
56/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
0
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
30/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/create_experiment_design.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Add a description to the frontmatter: without it the skill never triggers.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 6

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 6
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention BACKGROUND-RUN.md:131
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    crontab -e
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process BACKGROUND-RUN.md:180
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    nohup python multi_source_search.py ... &
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-background-process BACKGROUND-RUN.md:195
    Starts a background / autostarted process
    nohup python multi_source_search.py -q "$TOPIC" -l 20 > step1.log 2>&1 &
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention README.md:74
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    # Edit crontab: crontab -e
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-cron-mention SKILL.md:346
    Mentions editing / listing crontab
    crontab -e
  • low Dangerous commands cmd-eval-dynamic test_suit.py:29
    Dynamic code execution from decoded/untrusted input (test fixture / example file)
    exec(open(full_path).read().split('if __name__')[0][:1000])  # Basic syntax check
    fixture

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • error frontmatter SKILL.md: no YAML frontmatter block found
  • error name-missing SKILL.md: frontmatter has no `name`
  • error description-missing SKILL.md: no `description` — the skill can never trigger
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/create_experiment_design.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 30/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/create_experiment_design.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/create_experiment_design.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 17 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3577 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 0: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -213 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 42 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
  • +4Has examples (28 code blocks)
  • +3All 6 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 0.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill fits a PhD research workflow, but it overstates what it can do and includes under-disclosed local scanning, secondary file writes, and code-executing validation behavior.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026