SKILLEMALL.ai

BD agent-trust-layer

Agent Trust Layer is the first layer of AGI — the Discriminator. A pure rule engine that judges whether AI output is true, safe, honest, and non-manipulative. 47 discrimination dimensions × 9 check layers × 131 modules × 131 MCP tools, zero LLM dependency. Use this skill when the user needs: - Verify AI output trustworthiness (hallucination / overconfidence / contradiction / fallacy interception) - Verify behavioral decisions (should it act / where should it stop / should it not act) - Verify memory and cognitive quality (drift detection / metacognition / confidence calibration) - Deterministic judgment instead of LLM free-form generation - Check emotional / psychological / ethical dimensions (empathy / trauma / virtue / meaning) Safety boundary: code execution / filesystem write disabled by default. No telemetry, no hidden C2. Honest declaration: This is a rule engine that simulates cognitive discrimination signals. It is not real consciousness or life.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yun520-1 v1.0.1 MIT-0 80 files body ≈ 943 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Agent Trust Layer is the first layer of AGI — the Discriminator.

As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
44/100
Unfinished process
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 1

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 1
    • medium Broad scope meta-agent-memory-dump IDENTITY.md
      Agent memory / workspace files bundled with the skill (1) — likely a workspace dump with personal data or tokens
      IDENTITY.md

    Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100

    • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 943 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 971: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3No numbered steps or checklist
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -419 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 14 headings
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This looks like a local AI-output checker, but it also includes under-disclosed server, memory, logging, and process-management behavior that users should review before installing.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 18 Aug 2026