SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF ctf-web-reverse-audit

Web攻击与逆向审计助手：HTTP应用漏洞（SQLi/SSRF/SSTI/XXE/JWT/文件上传）利用，以及 Ghidra 无头反汇编与 semgrep 源码审计。遇到 web 题、源码审计、逆向分析、JWT、注入类题目时使用。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yxy050208 v1.0.0 MIT-0 43 files body ≈ 743 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

Web攻击与逆向审计助手：HTTP应用漏洞（SQLi/SSRF/SSTI/XXE/JWT/文件上传）利用，以及 Ghidra 无头反汇编与 semgrep 源码审计。遇到 web 题、源码审计、逆向分析、JWT、注入类题目时使用。

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/env-check.py

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/env-check.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security skill-card.md:51
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    **Other Properties Related to Output:** [May include offensive security commands and reverse-engineering workflows for authorized CTF or lab targets.]

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/env-check.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/env-check.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/env-check.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 19 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 743 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 115: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 9 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 19 items
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a static CTF security reference, but it includes broad, actionable exploit and bypass playbooks without enough scoping or safety warnings.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 27 Aug 2026