SKILLEMALL.ai

AF figma

Professional Figma design analysis and asset export. Use for extracting design data, exporting assets in multiple formats, auditing accessibility compliance, analyzing design systems, and generating comprehensive design documentation. Read-only analysis of Figma files with powerful export and reporting capabilities.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: yylgit v1.0.0 MIT-0 13 files body ≈ 1 607 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 33/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: templates/design-system/, templates/brand-kits/, templates/wireframes/

AnalyzerFigmaDesigntype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
79
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
33/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: templates/design-system/, templates/brand-kits/, templates/wireframes/
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: figma (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/design-system/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/brand-kits/
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/wireframes/

Process rating: all ten parameters 33/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: templates/design-system/, templates/brand-kits/, templates/wireframes/
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: templates/design-system/, templates/brand-kits/, templates/wireframes/
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (figma) differs from the folder (yyl-test-skill)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Steps. 59 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1607 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 317: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 59 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +3All 4 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This appears to be a legitimate Figma analysis and export skill, with normal token and file-output risks that users should manage carefully.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026