AC a-share-risk-alert
A股风险预警/ST预警/退市风险排查。当用户说"风险预警"、"有没有风险"、"会不会ST"、"退市风险"、"爆雷"、"暴雷"、"风险排查"、"XX安全吗"、"财务造假"、"审计意见"时触发。基于 cn-stock-data 财务数据，从盈利、现金流、负债、审计等维度排查个股风险信号。支持研报风格（formal）和快速排查风格（brief）。
As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 32 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 335 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 171: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 12 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 76.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This appears to be a stock-risk analysis skill with an overly broad trigger phrase list, but no evidence of hidden access, persistence, destructive behavior, or data exfiltration.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026