SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC browser-proof

Browser Proof is a public ClawHub browser-QA evidence skill. Use it when the user says "browser proof", "browser QA report", "browser debugging evidence", or wants a machine-readable bundle with steps, artifacts, checks, and a shareable report.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Zakhar Pashkin v1.0.5 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 992 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceData and analyticsSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "homepage"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 44 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 992 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (11 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 244: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 10 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
    • +3All 4 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    Browser Proof is a local browser-QA reporting helper that creates evidence manifests and reports, with no hidden network, credential, installer, or background behavior found.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026