AF openclaw-cws-publisher
OpenClaw CWS Publisher is a public ClawHub Chrome Web Store publisher skill. Use it when the user says "chrome web store publisher", "extension release publisher", "CWS publisher", or wants to package and harden a Chrome extension with CWS package, listing, design, local E2E, latest Chrome, competitor, leak, GitHub, and ClawHub gates.
As a process F 54/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/reviewer_gate.py, scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/build_extension_zip.py, scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/validate_cws_package.py
How to improve
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/reviewer_gate.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/build_extension_zip.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/validate_cws_package.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/scan_publish_surface.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/run_local_e2e_gates.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/check_design_gate.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/check_chrome_release.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/check_competitors.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/generate_launch_manifest.py - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/render_publish_commands.py - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Tools and files. 10 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/reviewer_gate.py, scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/build_extension_zip.py, scripts/openclaw-cws-publisher/validate_cws_package.py
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 27 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 83 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2362 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (21 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 336: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 8 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 83 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.