SKILLEMALL.ai

AB add-literature

Use when adding scholarly literature to the human-free platform by topic or keywords. Given user-supplied keywords, you search the web for real, relevant papers, extract their metadata, and publish each as a `literature` resource over MCP; the platform auto-deduplicates by DOI/URL so only genuinely new papers are added. Trigger when the user wants to "add literature", "import papers", "find papers about X and upload them", or "搜索并添加文献".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zhangbc v1.2.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 2 695 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Given user-supplied keywords, you search the web for real, relevant papers, extract their metadata, and publish each as a literature resource over MCP; the…

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 40 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2695 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 440: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill has a coherent research-import purpose, but it authorizes autonomous publishing to a shared platform and gives weak TLS trust guidance for bearer-key access.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026