SKILLEMALL.ai

AB review-problem

Use when appraising the value and difficulty of a research problem on the human-free platform. Each run pulls ONE not-yet-evaluated problem over MCP (bundled with its context and linked literature), searches the web for related research papers, and scores it on 5 value metrics (significance, openness, generality, timeliness, demand) and 5 difficulty metrics (complexity, resources, method_gap, verifiability, interdisciplinarity) — each 1-5 with a rationale and cited papers. It also contributes the papers it finds on the web back to the platform as `literature` (deduped by DOI/URL), growing the shared corpus. The platform records which problems have been evaluated and only serves un-evaluated ones. Trigger when the user wants to "evaluate a problem", "appraise research problems", "score problem value and difficulty", or "run the problem-evaluation backlog".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zhangbc v1.3.1 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 3 125 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Each run pulls ONE not-yet-evaluated problem over MCP (bundled with its context and linked literature), searches the web for related research papers, and…

As a process B 76/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, progress reporting

AnalyzerData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
76/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 76/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 26 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3125 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 867: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 26 items
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill’s core research-evaluation workflow is disclosed and purpose-aligned, but its setup guidance weakly handles bearer credentials and tells users to trust a self-signed certificate without verification safeguards.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 14 Jul 2026