SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD openclaw-orchestra

OpenClaw native multi-agent orchestrator. Based on AOrchestra 4-tuple (I,C,T,M) abstraction. Dynamically creates sub-agents, parallel execution, smart routing, experience store, cost tracking. Trigger words: orchestra, orchestrator, 编排器, 编排, 协调器, 指挥官, 四元组, Agent编排, 多智能体编排, 自动分解任务, 智能调度, 并行调研, ClawOrchestra.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zcyynl v0.1.0 MIT-0 21 files body ≈ 741 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
82
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
49/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 21. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (openclaw-orchestra) differs from the folder (claw-orchestra)
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 741 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -214 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 308: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 82.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This is a real multi-agent orchestration skill, but it gives agents broad automatic authority without enough user control or privacy scoping.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026