AC team-tasks
Coordinate multi-agent development pipelines using shared JSON task files. Use when dispatching work across dev team agents (code-agent, test-agent, docs-agent, monitor-bot), tracking pipeline progress, or running sequential/parallel workflows. Covers project init, task assignment, status tracking, agent dispatch via sessions_send, and result collection. Supports two modes: linear (sequential pipeline) and dag (dependency graph with parallel execution).
As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (team-tasks) differs from the folder (team-tasks-skip)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 24 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2798 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (11 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 457: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 29 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
- +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 79.