SKILLEMALL.ai

AC defect-prevention-expert

全生命周期质量保障专家,覆盖需求、设计、编码、测试、上线、运维全阶段的质量保障活动。 融合缺陷预防(逆向操作、依赖踏空、并发冲突、新旧兼容、状态迁移、因果判定)与质量度量、持续改进三大支柱, 帮助团队建立「预防-评审-度量-改进」的质量闭环,实现软件质量的持续提升。 Use when: - 需求/设计/编码/测试/上线/运维任一阶段,需要质量保障支持 - 需要识别潜在缺陷和风险点(预防阶段) - 需要评审已有产出的质量(评审阶段) - 需要量化评估质量水平(度量阶段) - 需要制定改进方案并跟踪效果(改进阶段) - Keywords: "缺陷预防", "质量保障", "全生命周期", "评审", "风险识别", "测试策略", "质量提升", "逆向操作", "依赖踏空", "并发冲突", "新旧兼容", "状态迁移", "因果图", "质量度量", "持续改进" Output: 根据阶段输出对应的分析报告(需求风险清单/设计缺陷报告/代码审查意见/测试场景补充建议/质量度量报告/改进方案等) Not for: 具体的代码修复(用 bug-fixing),性能优化(用 performance-optimization),纯代码重构(用 refactoring)

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zengqch v4.2.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 6 452 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 29 h ago

全生命周期质量保障专家,覆盖需求、设计、编码、测试、上线、运维全阶段的质量保障活动。 融合缺陷预防(逆向操作、依赖踏空、并发冲突、新旧兼容、状态迁移、因果判定)与质量度量、持续改进三大支柱, 帮助团队建立「预防-评审-度量-改进」的质量闭环,实现软件质量的持续提升。 Use when: -…

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 6452 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 6452 tokens
  • 100Tools and files. Tools declared in frontmatter
  • 100Steps. 200 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 22 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -233 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +3Description length 540: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 107 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 200 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent QA review helper, but it grants broader write and command authority than its documented tasks clearly need.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 15 Jun 2026