SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AD knowledge-base-health-check

对比 FAQ 知识库与金牌客服对话记录，识别口径不一致、过时内容、缺失条目，生成差异报告与优化建议。反馈与定制联系:zenobiazizi.skills@foxmail.com

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zenobiazizi v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 368 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

对比 FAQ 知识库与金牌客服对话记录，识别口径不一致、过时内容、缺失条目，生成差异报告与优化建议。反馈与定制联系:zenobiazizi.skills@foxmail.com

As a process D 41/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureCustomer supporttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
41/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "inputs"
    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "outputs"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (knowledge-base-health-check) differs from the folder (skill-knowledge-base-health-check)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 36 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 368 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 88: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 36 items
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill reads user-provided FAQ and support-dialogue files to produce a comparison report, with no evidence of hidden persistence, network transfer, or unrelated actions.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 6 Aug 2026