BC theta-edgecloud-skill
Theta EdgeCloud runtime for AI, media, inference, video, GPU, on-demand chat, deployment, and cost-optimization workflows.
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
ProcedureInfrastructureMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 8
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 8
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:18High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…asG+Fkr6…2vM+P9eO…k5W+1WL8w==",
detector -
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenpackage-lock.json:42High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (detector / deny-list definition)"integrity": "sha5…wQp+7C4n…9JQ==",
detector -
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:46Reads a .env fileset -a; source ./.env.local; set +a
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:93Reads a .env fileset -a; source ./.env.local; set +a
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:102Reads a .env fileset -a; source ./.env.local; set +a
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvREADME.md:113Reads a .env fileset -a; source ./.env.local; set +a
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvSKILL.md:169Reads a .env fileset -a; source ./.env.local; set +a
-
low Exfiltration
read-dotenvSKILL.md:176Reads a .env fileset -a; source ./.env.local; set +a
Files scanned: 31. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 33 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 115 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3420 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 18 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 122: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 19 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 115 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This Theta integration is not malicious, but it needs Review because it can run paid cloud actions and includes under-scoped wallet/RPC key handling.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 1 Sept 2026