SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD boheng-investment-workflow

投资研究多智能体决策系统 - 8位专业分析师并行研究，加权投票给出投资建议。支持A股股票/基金/ETF/可转债。支持真实财报数据（baostock）或基础行情数据。⚠️ 风险提示：分析结果仅供学习参考，不构成投资建议。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zhangboheng v1.5.5 MIT-0 26 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 4 433 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 26. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "author_website"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "author_brand"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "author_pen_name"

Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4433 tokens
  • 100Steps. 79 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 109: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -287 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -33 of 21 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 44 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 79 items
  • +4Has examples (23 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This appears to be a real investment-analysis skill, but its external network use and optional command/browser automation are not disclosed consistently enough for automatic approval.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026