SKILLEMALL.ai

AC self-evolve

Self-evolution system for OpenClaw agents. Enables continuous learning through mistake tracking, experience distillation, skill improvement queues, and automated daily/weekly evolution cycles. Inspired by Hermes Agent's self-improving architecture, implemented with native OpenClaw capabilities (memory files + cron). 自我进化系统,让 OpenClaw agent 持续学习和改进。 Use when: (1) setting up self-evolution for an agent, (2) agent wants to learn from mistakes, (3) capturing lessons learned, (4) running evolution cycles, (5) improving skills based on usage, (6) "自我进化", "自我学习", "self-improve", "learn from mistakes", "evolution setup", "进化系统", "经验总结", "复盘". NOT for: memory management basics (use AGENTS.md), skill creation (use skill-creator), or one-off reminders (use cron directly).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: zhanghengyi1986-afk v1.0.0 MIT-0 5 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 275 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
100/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
100
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (self-evolve) differs from the folder (agent-self-evolve)
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 24 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1275 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 771: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 1 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 100.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is openly designed for agent learning, but it can run scheduled self-updates that modify code, skills, and memory without clear per-change approval.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026