SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF huo15-openclaw-security-review

对当前分支的 pending changes 做安全评审，命中密钥泄露 / SQL 注入 / XSS / SSRF / 权限绕过 / 危险依赖 六大类漏洞后出分级报告，再在用户批准下修复。用于 PR 合并前、对外开源前、线上事故后复盘。触发词：安全评审、security review、漏洞检查、密钥扫描、我的代码有没有安全问题。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Job Zhao v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 964 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: [A-Za-z0-9_\-]{20,}

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: [A-Za-z0-9_\-]{20,}
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: [A-Za-z0-9_\-]{20,}
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "aliases"

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: [A-Za-z0-9_\-]{20,}
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: [A-Za-z0-9_\-]{20,}
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 100Steps. 34 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 964 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 165: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 14 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 34 items
  • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is an instruction-only security review skill that scans repository changes for common vulnerability patterns and does not install code, run background tasks, or hide privileged behavior.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026