SKILLEMALL.ai

BD ai-eval-toolkit

LLM 评测工具链(可运行实现)——把评测方法论变成能直接跑的本地引擎:评测集管理(JSONL 建集/质量检查/规模统计)、幻觉检测引擎(数字一致性/引用校验/否定矛盾/关键论断互证四类规则检测)、RAG 指标计算(RAGAS 四指标的本地简化实现:忠实度/答案相关性/上下文精度/上下文召回)、回归对比(基线 vs 新结果差异判定)、报告生成与上线门禁(分场景得分/门禁判定/报告输出)。零依赖纯标准库,本地闭环不联网。与「LLM 质量评测」(方法论)互补——那个讲怎么做,这个给能跑的实现。面向 AI 工程师、测试与质量负责人。

ClawHub Hermes author: zhaoxinghua09-cell v1.0.0 MIT-0 18 files body ≈ 657 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

LLM 评测工具链(可运行实现)——把评测方法论变成能直接跑的本地引擎:评测集管理(JSONL 建集/质量检查/规模统计)、幻觉检测引擎(数字一致性/引用校验/否定矛盾/关键论断互证四类规则检测)、RAG 指标计算(RAGAS 四指标的本地简化实现:忠实度/答案相关性/上下文精度/上下文召回)、回归对比(基线 vs…

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
68
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-long-hermes description is 266 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period)
  • warning description-no-when neither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "slug"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "display_name"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "displayName"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "title"
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "description_en"

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 15 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 657 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 266: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
  • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 68.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a local LLM evaluation toolkit whose file access and command use match its stated purpose, though its security audit document has copy-paste inaccuracies.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 27 Aug 2026