BD mcp-security-scan
当用户说『接了个MCP server不放心』『MCP工具能执行命令怕有风险』『怎么审计MCP权限』『第三方MCP会不会偷数据』，或要把某 MCP server(模型上下文协议)接进 agent、担心它是新攻击面时使用。把 MCP server 当『需审查的第三方』：扫工具清单里的 命令执行/文件系统写/网络外联/凭证暴露 四类风险，给风险评级与最小授权建议。理论根基：LGD 三律（有籍·有证·有门禁）。触发词：MCP安全、mcp security、MCP审计、MCP权限、第三方MCP、MCP风险、server扫描、协议安全。
当用户说『接了个MCP server不放心』『MCP工具能执行命令怕有风险』『怎么审计MCP权限』『第三方MCP会不会偷数据』，或要把某 MCP server(模型上下文协议)接进 agent、担心它是新攻击面时使用。把 MCP server 当『需审查的第三方』：扫工具清单里的…
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- For Hermes the description must be one sentence under 60 characters; move the conditions to a "When to Use" section.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-long-hermesdescription is 265 chars; the Hermes authoring standard requires ≤ 60 (one sentence, ending with a period) - warning
description-no-whenneither description nor a "## When to Use" section says when to use the skill - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "slug" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "displayName" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "title" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "display_name_en" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "summary" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "agent_created" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "copyright" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "read_when" - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 17 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 510 tokens
- 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -31 of 1 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 265: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
- +1License stated
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 61.